<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Photography: Adding Sensitive Issues restrictions to your RM or RP images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/copyright-for-photographers/licensing-licencing/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/copyright-for-photographers/licensing-licencing/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/</link>
	<description>tips, tricks, tutorials, comment and insight on the business of photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/copyright-for-photographers/licensing-licencing/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/comment-page-1/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>Hi Kathryn,  

First off thanks!  

Second, no you don&#039;t have to spell the uses out as there is a &quot;sensitive issues&quot; option in the &quot;Industry&quot; drop down on the Restrictions screen.  There are separate options for &quot;Politics/Religion&quot; and &quot;Tobacco&quot;  but no selections for alcohol or sexual issues (could be sexual health related not just sex-industry though the more pornographic versions of the latter would not be able to be placed on a library such as Alamy and licenced anyway).  So I guess these two would be within the &quot;sensitive issues&quot; option.  

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kathryn,  </p>
<p>First off thanks!  </p>
<p>Second, no you don&#8217;t have to spell the uses out as there is a &#8220;sensitive issues&#8221; option in the &#8220;Industry&#8221; drop down on the Restrictions screen.  There are separate options for &#8220;Politics/Religion&#8221; and &#8220;Tobacco&#8221;  but no selections for alcohol or sexual issues (could be sexual health related not just sex-industry though the more pornographic versions of the latter would not be able to be placed on a library such as Alamy and licenced anyway).  So I guess these two would be within the &#8220;sensitive issues&#8221; option.  </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/copyright-for-photographers/licensing-licencing/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/photography-business/stock-photography-adding-sensitive-issues-restrictions-to-your-rm-or-rp-images/#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Would you have to spell out all the restricted sensitive uses yourself on Alamy? Or are uses such as sexually explicit material included in the term &quot;sensitive issues&quot;?
Thank you so much for all these stock photography posts-- your stuff about RM vs. RF is invaluable information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you have to spell out all the restricted sensitive uses yourself on Alamy? Or are uses such as sexually explicit material included in the term &#8220;sensitive issues&#8221;?<br />
Thank you so much for all these stock photography posts&#8211; your stuff about RM vs. RF is invaluable information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

