<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;BHZ&#8221; and how to measure or find your Alamy Rank</title>
	<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/</link>
	<description>tips, tricks, tutorials, comment and insight on the business of photography</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure RF was not included because of the way Alamy's diversity algorithm promotes RF images above their natural punching weight, so there's a spread of RF in among the many RM.  

An RF BHZ would work though via the filtering.  Good point.  

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure RF was not included because of the way Alamy&#8217;s diversity algorithm promotes RF images above their natural punching weight, so there&#8217;s a spread of RF in among the many RM.  </p>
<p>An RF BHZ would work though via the filtering.  Good point.  </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BHZ has flaws</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>BHZ has flaws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>This should be extended to RF images as well (so one RF image and one L image per pseudo). Anyone can restrict the bhz search to one or the other. Plus, there are plenty of contributors/agencies who only submit RF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be extended to RF images as well (so one RF image and one L image per pseudo). Anyone can restrict the bhz search to one or the other. Plus, there are plenty of contributors/agencies who only submit RF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree, Rank is fixed.  I think we're shooting at this from different ends though.  I'd love to know my Rank.  But I'm not going to find it easily.  

Because BHZ is a fixed search then at least it shows me where I am on a re-Rank compared to others (currently about 1200) playing the same game.  I can see if I go up or down. 

The trouble with doing a generalist search like "people" is you've no way of knowing where "people" is in the competitions kw sets (essential, main, comp) etc. So any reading of position from that is flawed too.  BHZ stipulates essential field only.  Of course people don't follow instructions which is why we hav 40 odd RF images marked BHZ!! :)

There's no perfect way to do this.  But for me BHZ is better to gauge my own Rank yo-yo than other method's I've tried. 

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree, Rank is fixed.  I think we&#8217;re shooting at this from different ends though.  I&#8217;d love to know my Rank.  But I&#8217;m not going to find it easily.  </p>
<p>Because BHZ is a fixed search then at least it shows me where I am on a re-Rank compared to others (currently about 1200) playing the same game.  I can see if I go up or down. </p>
<p>The trouble with doing a generalist search like &#8220;people&#8221; is you&#8217;ve no way of knowing where &#8220;people&#8221; is in the competitions kw sets (essential, main, comp) etc. So any reading of position from that is flawed too.  BHZ stipulates essential field only.  Of course people don&#8217;t follow instructions which is why we hav 40 odd RF images marked BHZ!! :)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no perfect way to do this.  But for me BHZ is better to gauge my own Rank yo-yo than other method&#8217;s I&#8217;ve tried. </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Of course the placing of your images varies depending on what else is out there but that doesn't mean that your rank is changing.

You say: "There is nowhere in the contributor screens that says “Your Alamy Rank is XX”. This is because your rank position will vary with each search made by a buyer."

That is not the explanation why Alamy don't tell us our rank. They don't tell us because they choose not to, but every contributor has a fixed rank that doesn't change until the next re-rank.

About BHZ: It is a poor indicator of how well you rank because it obviously does not include those that do not "play the game". And those that play and those that don't are not "equal". Most of the highly ranked contributors do not bother with it (eg Jon Arnold, Art Kowalsky); so by playing BHZ you may be flattering yourself that you are doing better than you actually are.

If you want to compare yourself with other forum obsessives then it's fine, but to get a truer picture then do a broad search (like UK, USA, PEOPLE) and see how well you fare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the placing of your images varies depending on what else is out there but that doesn&#8217;t mean that your rank is changing.</p>
<p>You say: &#8220;There is nowhere in the contributor screens that says “Your Alamy Rank is XX”. This is because your rank position will vary with each search made by a buyer.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is not the explanation why Alamy don&#8217;t tell us our rank. They don&#8217;t tell us because they choose not to, but every contributor has a fixed rank that doesn&#8217;t change until the next re-rank.</p>
<p>About BHZ: It is a poor indicator of how well you rank because it obviously does not include those that do not &#8220;play the game&#8221;. And those that play and those that don&#8217;t are not &#8220;equal&#8221;. Most of the highly ranked contributors do not bother with it (eg Jon Arnold, Art Kowalsky); so by playing BHZ you may be flattering yourself that you are doing better than you actually are.</p>
<p>If you want to compare yourself with other forum obsessives then it&#8217;s fine, but to get a truer picture then do a broad search (like UK, USA, PEOPLE) and see how well you fare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

Depends how you look at it.  

Your *Alamy assigned rank* is only changed every 100 days or so.  That's known. 

But for each search you do, depending on the competition's Alamy Rank your placement will vary. You may be "ranked" 5 for "dolphin wearing sunglasses" (with four others of higher Rank above) and 505 for "UK" (with 504 others with a higher Rank above) etc etc. 

It all depends who else has images with the same keywords as yours that are returned for the same search. 

So as far as I see it on a day to day basis &lt;em&gt;in real terms&lt;/em&gt; (because they are the only terms that matter) your Alamy Rank gives you a placement which is *always* relative to the competition and changes on a search by search basis. 

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Depends how you look at it.  </p>
<p>Your *Alamy assigned rank* is only changed every 100 days or so.  That&#8217;s known. </p>
<p>But for each search you do, depending on the competition&#8217;s Alamy Rank your placement will vary. You may be &#8220;ranked&#8221; 5 for &#8220;dolphin wearing sunglasses&#8221; (with four others of higher Rank above) and 505 for &#8220;UK&#8221; (with 504 others with a higher Rank above) etc etc. </p>
<p>It all depends who else has images with the same keywords as yours that are returned for the same search. </p>
<p>So as far as I see it on a day to day basis <em>in real terms</em> (because they are the only terms that matter) your Alamy Rank gives you a placement which is *always* relative to the competition and changes on a search by search basis. </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>"your Alamy Rank in real terms will vary on each and every search"

This is simply wrong. Your rank does not vary on each and every search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;your Alamy Rank in real terms will vary on each and every search&#8221;</p>
<p>This is simply wrong. Your rank does not vary on each and every search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Hi David, 

A zoom is recorded when a thumbnail is clicked by a certain set of buyers as pre-defined by Alamy.  Presumably these are people with multiple sales records; account customers etc. i.e. regular buyers. 

A zoom is not registered by anyone else clicking a thumbnail (else we'd all be doing it.....!!!)

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, </p>
<p>A zoom is recorded when a thumbnail is clicked by a certain set of buyers as pre-defined by Alamy.  Presumably these are people with multiple sales records; account customers etc. i.e. regular buyers. </p>
<p>A zoom is not registered by anyone else clicking a thumbnail (else we&#8217;d all be doing it&#8230;..!!!)</p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for posting this very useful technique.

Do you happen to know what constitutes a view or a zoom? what i mean here is 'viewed by whom?' Do you have to be a registered, logged-in client to have your views counted? Otherwise, surely people could manipulate their CTR% by searching and zooming their own pics...

cheers, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for posting this very useful technique.</p>
<p>Do you happen to know what constitutes a view or a zoom? what i mean here is &#8216;viewed by whom?&#8217; Do you have to be a registered, logged-in client to have your views counted? Otherwise, surely people could manipulate their CTR% by searching and zooming their own pics&#8230;</p>
<p>cheers, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Hi Clair, 

Thanks for your nice words! 

No, you can choose any "L" image.  Just add BHZ as detailed above to the essential keywords field of ANY "L" image, but only ONE image for each pseudonym you have.  It does not matter how successful that image is within your collection. 

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clair, </p>
<p>Thanks for your nice words! </p>
<p>No, you can choose any &#8220;L&#8221; image.  Just add BHZ as detailed above to the essential keywords field of ANY &#8220;L&#8221; image, but only ONE image for each pseudonym you have.  It does not matter how successful that image is within your collection. </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clair Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Clair Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/bhz-and-how-to-measure-or-find-your-alamy-rank/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hi --
I've just discovered your site in the last couple of weeks (from the Alamy Forum). And, I am paying attention. As you already must know, it is extremely valuable. Thank you.

My question is this -- does it matter WHICH image you add BHZ to? I mean should it be the one that has the most Views or one that has had none? Does it matter at all?

Thanks.
Clair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211;<br />
I&#8217;ve just discovered your site in the last couple of weeks (from the Alamy Forum). And, I am paying attention. As you already must know, it is extremely valuable. Thank you.</p>
<p>My question is this &#8212; does it matter WHICH image you add BHZ to? I mean should it be the one that has the most Views or one that has had none? Does it matter at all?</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
Clair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
