<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Any web sized image at Getty for $49: Is this the beginning of the end for RF stock photography?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/</link>
	<description>tips, tricks, tutorials, comment and insight on the business of photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wer bietet weniger? Viele Bildagenturen kürzen Honorare der Fotografen &#171; Alltag eines Fotoproduzenten</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Wer bietet weniger? Viele Bildagenturen kürzen Honorare der Fotografen &#171; Alltag eines Fotoproduzenten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>[...] Images: Die dominierende Bildagentur machte es etwas anders. Sie senkte Anfang 2008 einfach die Preise für die Webnutzung ihrer Fotos auf 49$ (und damit um bis zu 96% des [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Images: Die dominierende Bildagentur machte es etwas anders. Sie senkte Anfang 2008 einfach die Preise für die Webnutzung ihrer Fotos auf 49$ (und damit um bis zu 96% des [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/any-web-sized-image-at-getty-for-49-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-rf-stock-photography/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thought I&#039;d better update this entry.  

Due to much pressure from Photographer&#039;s representative bodies like the ASMP, AoP, a whole gamut (sorry for the pun) of other bodies but  especially the Stock Artists Alliance (SAA), Getty have decided to modify the $49 web licence by restricting its duration depending on whether the image is RM or RR. 

Lots more info here:

http://www.stockartistsalliance.org/info/news/news_Getty.htm#dialog

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I&#8217;d better update this entry.  </p>
<p>Due to much pressure from Photographer&#8217;s representative bodies like the ASMP, AoP, a whole gamut (sorry for the pun) of other bodies but  especially the Stock Artists Alliance (SAA), Getty have decided to modify the $49 web licence by restricting its duration depending on whether the image is RM or RR. </p>
<p>Lots more info here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stockartistsalliance.org/info/news/news_Getty.htm#dialog" rel="nofollow">http://www.stockartistsalliance.org/info/news/news_Getty.htm#dialog</a></p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

