<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alamy announce sympathies for the plight of the UK Newspaper industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/</link>
	<description>tips, tricks, tutorials, comment and insight on the business of photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:25:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Hi James, 

Thanks for the clarification.  Yes, you&#039;re right - there was a 300db noise on your blog and the forum too. It felt like the world was about to end. 

300 out of 17,000 is not proportionate of the Alamy contributor base so I have included your clarification above, quoting you in the main body of the post. 

Looking forward to the further announcements.  

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James, </p>
<p>Thanks for the clarification.  Yes, you&#8217;re right &#8211; there was a 300db noise on your blog and the forum too. It felt like the world was about to end. </p>
<p>300 out of 17,000 is not proportionate of the Alamy contributor base so I have included your clarification above, quoting you in the main body of the post. </p>
<p>Looking forward to the further announcements.  </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James West</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>James West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Clarification to readers - approximately 17,000 contributors received my email about UK newspapers and 300 opted out. The author has used the reaction on the Alamy forum to gauge contributor opinion, which is not representative of opinion across the Alamy contributor community as a whole.

James West
CEO
Alamy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarification to readers &#8211; approximately 17,000 contributors received my email about UK newspapers and 300 opted out. The author has used the reaction on the Alamy forum to gauge contributor opinion, which is not representative of opinion across the Alamy contributor community as a whole.</p>
<p>James West<br />
CEO<br />
Alamy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PP</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>PP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>David(?),

It was my attempt at some wry humour.  

Sorry I was late posting my take on the issue.  Unfortunately I was busy last week and the week before making money instead of writing about it ;)  I do this for fun not for profit (the writing that is). 

PP

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David(?),</p>
<p>It was my attempt at some wry humour.  </p>
<p>Sorry I was late posting my take on the issue.  Unfortunately I was busy last week and the week before making money instead of writing about it ;)  I do this for fun not for profit (the writing that is). </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotographybiz.com/comment/alamy-announce-sympathies-for-the-plight-of-the-uk-newspaper-industry/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>&quot;Luckily for James Microsoft Outlook doesn’t yet support dog turds as a valid attachment type… ;)&quot;

If this is meant to be an example of your reasoned discussion, I&#039;ll pass in future.

There&#039;s a much more succinct and well argued discussion of this issue (which was posted the day after the email was sent out here:

http://www.professionalphotographer.co.uk/blogs/stephen-power/Posts/240</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Luckily for James Microsoft Outlook doesn’t yet support dog turds as a valid attachment type… ;)&#8221;</p>
<p>If this is meant to be an example of your reasoned discussion, I&#8217;ll pass in future.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a much more succinct and well argued discussion of this issue (which was posted the day after the email was sent out here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.professionalphotographer.co.uk/blogs/stephen-power/Posts/240" rel="nofollow">http://www.professionalphotographer.co.uk/blogs/stephen-power/Posts/240</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
